How to Evaluate a UV Printing Machine: A Production Acceptance Checklist
Published · By the PRO TECHnology Digital Printing team
A good demonstration sample shows what a machine can do once. Acceptance testing shows whether it repeats that result on your materials, at the output you need.
To verify a UV printer before you buy or accept it, run a print trial on your own production materials and artwork, against written criteria agreed before printing starts. Measure accepted output per hour rather than rated speed, test each durability property separately, and check that results repeat across a long run, a restart and a new material batch. Then repeat the key checks after installation and sign the acceptance record.
This checklist starts once a model is shortlisted; to choose a machine type first, see choosing a UV printing machine. It is brand-neutral and works with any machine or supplier.
- Written for
- Production, quality and procurement teams
- Machines
- UV flatbed, cylindrical and wall printers
- Result
- A signed acceptance record and handover file
- Download
- Editable Excel checklist

Key takeaways
- A demonstration sample is evidence of capability, not of production performance.
- Write the acceptance criteria before the trial, using your own materials, artwork and finish.
- Measure accepted output per hour, not rated speed, over a timed run that includes loading, cleaning, stoppages and rejects.
- Adhesion is only one property: rub, chemical, water and dishwasher resistance each need their own agreed test.
- Repeat the key checks after installation, then sign an acceptance record of the exact configuration that passed and keep it in the handover file.
Why a demonstration sample does not prove production performance
A demonstration is designed to show a machine at its best. The file has been prepared and proofed, the operator knows the machine well, the item is often a clean sample, and only a few pieces are printed. None of that is dishonest, but it answers a narrower question than the one a buyer has to answer.
Production adds the variables a demonstration leaves out: material from several batches, the hardest elements of your artwork, shift-length runs with loading and cleaning, operators with different experience, and the handling and exposure your product meets after printing. Acceptance testing brings those variables into the evaluation before money and responsibility change hands.
| Stage | Where it usually happens | What it can prove | What it cannot prove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demonstration | The supplier's showroom or studio | That the machine type can print this kind of item and design | Output, durability or repeatability on your materials |
| Print trial | The supplier's facility, with your materials and artwork | Print quality, first durability results and a timed run on your product | Performance of the unit you receive, at your site, with your operators and utilities |
| Factory acceptance test (FAT) | The manufacturer's or supplier's facility, before shipment | That the configured machine meets the agreed criteria before it ships | Behaviour after transport, installation and local site conditions |
| Site acceptance test (SAT) | Your facility, after installation and commissioning | That the installed machine meets the agreed criteria with your utilities, environment and operators | Long-term reliability, which only production history shows |
| Handover | Your facility | That training, documents and the accepted configuration have been transferred | Nothing new on its own; it records what the earlier stages proved |
Not every purchase needs a formal factory acceptance test. For a single machine, a thorough print trial followed by a site acceptance test is often enough. What matters is that the criteria are written down and measured, at whichever stage they are checked.
Step 1: Define the application in writing
Acceptance is only as clear as the specification it is measured against. Before any trial, write a short application specification that both buyer and supplier sign. It turns "print our bottles" into a description that a test can be judged against. In this guide, "supplier" means the machine supplier; the company that makes your bottles, panels or coatings is the "material supplier".
| Item | What to write down | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Substrate | Material and grade, the material supplier, and any coating, lacquer or surface treatment it applies | The ink bonds to the surface it meets, which is often a coating rather than the base material |
| Geometry | Dimensions and tolerances, flat, cylindrical or tapered areas, curves, edges, recesses and the print area | Print distance and fixturing affect sharpness, overspray and registration |
| Artwork | Smallest text and line width, gradients, solids, brand colours, codes, and the number of designs | The hardest element sets the print mode, and the print mode sets the speed |
| White, varnish and texture | Where white ink is used, whether varnish is gloss, matt or raised, and any tactile height | Each extra layer adds passes, ink and time, and can change durability |
| Finish and appearance | Gloss level, opacity, colour references and who signs the approved sample (Step 4) | Visual criteria need a physical reference, not a description |
| Handling after printing | Filling, capping, packing, conveying, transport and retail handling | Print can be damaged after printing, in contact with other parts and packaging |
| Exposure in use | Contact with perfume, alcohol, cleaning agents, water, ice, heat, sunlight or washing | Each exposure needs its own test and pass criterion |
| Volume and mix | Pieces per day, batch sizes, number of changeovers and seasonal peaks | Output targets must reflect the real job mix, not one long run of a single design |
Be honest about what is still unknown. If the perfume formula or the bottle coating has not been finalised, the trial result applies only to the version tested. Where adhesion is uncertain, start with the untreated part and add one pre-treatment at a time, so that the route which passes is the one written into the specification.
Step 2: Prepare a representative trial
A trial is representative when it uses what production will use. The buyer supplies the materials from normal production stock rather than hand-picked samples, and the supplier prints them in the configuration that would be delivered.
- Materials: supply enough pieces for the timed run, every durability test and the approved samples, from at least two batches or deliveries where possible, including every coating colour or finish that will be printed. If only one batch exists, record that the result is limited to it. Print items at the temperature they will have in production and record it, because cold or filled items brought into a warm room can carry condensation you cannot see.
- Artwork: use real production files plus a test file with the smallest positive and reversed text, the finest lines, a smooth gradient, large solids, brand colours, any white or varnish layers you need, and a solid patch large enough for an adhesion test.
- Configuration: print with the ink set, primer or pre-treatment, print mode, curing set-up and fixtures that would be supplied, not a higher-specification demonstration build. If the trial uses pre-treatment equipment you will not have, record that as a limit of the result. Flame and plasma treatment and some primers lose effect with time, so record the interval between pre-treatment and printing and keep within the window the primer or pre-treatment maker gives.
- Fixtures: use the production fixture, or record that a temporary one was used. Check that every position holds the item at the same place and height, because height differences change the print distance and sharpness and can bring an item close enough to strike the print heads. Ask who makes each new fixture, how long it takes and whether it is in the quotation.
- Quantity: agree a timed run long enough to include reloading, at least one planned stop and restart, and samples from each material batch. A handful of pieces cannot show rejects or drift.
- People: note who operates the machine. If your own staff will run production, ask for part of the run to be loaded and inspected by someone with comparable experience.
- Criteria first: write the acceptance criteria, test methods and number of samples per test before printing starts, and agree who judges borderline results.
Round and tapered items add their own checks, such as how the wrap closes and whether colour holds across container sizes; see what to test on a cylindrical printer. A wall printer works on site, so its acceptance happens on site too: ask for a timed test print on a wall like yours.
Step 3: Measure accepted output, not rated speed
Accepted output per hour is the number of pieces that pass inspection in a shift, divided by the length of the shift in hours. It is the figure to compare between machines, because rated speed is measured under the manufacturer's conditions and makes no allowance for your loading, inspection, cleaning or rejects.
Manufacturers rate speed under stated conditions. UV flatbed printers are usually rated in square metres per hour for a print mode, which says little about pieces per hour until it is timed on your fixture, because the carriage also travels over the gaps between items. Cylindrical printers are rated in pieces per minute or hour: LSINC, for example, gives the speeds of its PeriOne, PeriQ360 and Perivallo360m as maximums for 4 inch (101.6 mm) artwork, and says speed depends on image height, resolution and print mode. Hourly figures like these assume uninterrupted printing, with no stated allowance for cleaning, stoppages or rejects. They are useful for a first comparison only.
| Term | What it means | How to measure it |
|---|---|---|
| Rated speed | The manufacturer's figure for a stated print mode, object or area | Read it from the specification, with its conditions |
| Print cycle time | Time the machine needs to print and cure one load, with every layer the artwork needs | Time several cycles on your artwork and average them |
| Machine cycle time | Print cycle plus any time the machine stands idle while it is loaded, unloaded or swapped | Time from the start of one cycle to the start of the next |
| Available printing time | Shift time less start-up, nozzle checks, cleaning, changeovers, breaks with nobody covering the machine, and stoppages | Log every non-printing activity during the trial |
| Accepted output per hour | Accepted pieces per shift divided by the shift length in hours, with the same shift pattern for every machine compared | Time cycles, log stops and count rejects against the written criteria during the trial, then apply them to your shift |
Count each minute once. Some activities stop the machine and add to every cycle, some come off the available printing time, and some happen while the machine prints.
- In every cycle (the machine waits): loading and unloading on a single fixture, and swapping fixtures. Every pass the artwork needs, including white, varnish and texture, belongs in the timed print cycle itself.
- Off the available time: start-up, nozzle checks, cleaning and artwork changeovers. Put each activity either in the cycle or in this list, never both.
- In parallel (the machine keeps printing): loading a second fixture while the first prints, inspecting and packing finished pieces and preparing the next batch, provided one person can do the work in the time available.
- Check the overlap: if the operator who loads also inspects, add both tasks together and compare them with the print cycle. If they take longer, the operator sets the pace, not the machine.
Hypothetical example: flat-sided bottles on a UV flatbed printer
Hypothetical figures for illustration only. They are not measurements of any machine or customer job. Replace every input with values timed in your own trial.
| Input or step | One fixture | Two fixtures |
|---|---|---|
| Bottles per fixture | 24 | 24 |
| Print and cure one fixture, every layer included | 9 min | 9 min |
| Print-only rate, the figure closest to a rated speed | 24 x 60 / 9 = 160 per hour | 24 x 60 / 9 = 160 per hour |
| Load and unload one fixture | 6 min, machine waits | 6 min, done while the other fixture prints |
| Swap fixtures | None, one fixture | 1 min assumed, machine waits |
| Visual check of 24 bottles at 5 seconds each | 2 min, while the next load prints | 2 min, while the next load prints |
| Operators | 1 | 1 |
| Operator time per cycle | 6 + 2 = 8 of 15 min | 1 + 6 + 2 = 9 of 10 min |
| Machine cycle time | 9 + 6 = 15 min | 9 + 1 = 10 min, because loading and inspection (8 min) fit inside the 9 min print |
| Shift length | 480 min | 480 min |
| Start-up and nozzle check, end-of-shift cleaning | 20 + 15 min | 20 + 15 min |
| Breaks with nobody covering the machine, unplanned stops | 30 + 25 min | 30 + 25 min |
| Available printing time | 480 - 90 = 390 min | 480 - 90 = 390 min |
| Cycles in the shift | 390 / 15 = 26 | 390 / 10 = 39 |
| Bottles printed | 26 x 24 = 624 | 39 x 24 = 936 |
| Rejects at 4 percent | 25 | 37 |
| Accepted bottles per shift | 599 | 899 |
| Accepted output per hour of shift | 599 / 8 = about 75 | 899 / 8 = about 112 |
In this hypothetical example, the same machine, artwork and single operator give about 75 or about 112 accepted bottles an hour, against a print-only rate of 160. The only difference is a second fixture that lets the operator load while the machine prints, and the gain depends on the swap time: with a 3 minute swap, the two-fixture result falls to about 92. The example assumes the 9 minute print includes every layer, that the first fixture is loaded during start-up and the last unloaded during cleaning. It leaves out things a real trial should time: artwork changeovers, pre-treatment, packing, ink top-ups and longer stops.
A trial run is usually shorter than a shift. Time the cycles, log every stop and count rejects during the trial, calculate the shift figure with the agreed allowances, and confirm it at site acceptance with a full-shift output run. Treat a reject rate from a short run as provisional: 4 rejects in 100 pieces could come from a real rate anywhere between about 1 and 10 percent.
Rejects also cost material and machine time. At 4 percent, an order for 1,000 good bottles needs about 1,042 printed, and reprinting a few rejects on a part-filled fixture can take almost a full cycle. Record ink use per piece as well: weigh a full fixture of pieces before and after printing, and measure refills over the run, because refills also include the ink used for purges and cleaning. Feed the measured figures into a cost model rather than a rated-speed calculator; our bottlers' guide sets out a cost-of-ownership framework.
Step 4: Judge print quality against an approved sample
An approved sample is a printed piece of your own product, signed by buyer and supplier, that sets the standard for colour, finish and defects. Agree in the test plan how it will be made, for example from the first pieces printed in the trial, and sign it before the timed run starts. Print quality is easiest to accept when every criterion refers to a measurement or to that sample. Judge pieces under controlled lighting, because colour and defects look different under warehouse lights, daylight and a viewing booth. ISO 3664 sets out viewing conditions for comparing prints.
| What to check | How to check it | How to write the criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Small text and fine lines | A test file with graded positive and reversed text and line widths, inspected with a magnifier | The smallest size that must stay legible and unbroken on every sample |
| Gradients and solids | Visual inspection for banding, graininess, mottle and streaks | No visible banding at the agreed viewing distance compared with the approved sample |
| Colour | A spectrophotometer on brand-colour patches, with the ISO 13655 measurement condition (such as M1 or M2), light source and observer angle stated, and for clear glass or plastic the backing placed behind the patch; colour difference calculated with CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) | A maximum colour difference agreed between buyer and supplier, measured with the same instrument, or the same model checked against the approved sample, at trial and acceptance |
| White opacity | White printed over the darkest and most transparent substrates, compared with the approved sample under the agreed light; where a number is needed, the lightness (L*) of the white measured over a black background | Show-through no greater than the approved sample, or a minimum measured lightness agreed with the supplier |
| Registration | Colour-to-colour and white-to-colour fit checked with a measuring magnifier; image-to-product position measured with callipers or a template, on pieces from every fixture position or spindle | Separate maximum offsets in millimetres for colour fit, white fit and image position |
| Cylindrical seam and taper | Where a 360 degree wrap closes, on items from both ends of the diameter tolerance and on any out-of-round pieces, and how sharpness holds across tapered areas | Seam position, gap or overlap, and visibility agreed against the approved sample |
| Gloss and finish | Comparison with the approved sample under the agreed light; a gloss meter where a value is specified | Gloss equal to the approved sample, or within an agreed range |
| Texture and raised print | Height measured with a gauge where height is specified | A height range, taken from the code or brand standard that applies |
| Codes | Barcodes and QR codes scanned on the finished item with the scanners used in your supply chain, and graded with a barcode verifier where a retailer requires a grade | Every code scans first time on the finished item and meets any required grade |
| Surface defects | Missing nozzles, satellite drops, overspray, dust and static on plastics, pinholes, ink pulling back from the surface, and any tack or odour after curing | No defect visible at the agreed viewing distance and no tack; anything beyond that defined as a reject |
Colour needs particular care, because we have found no ISO standard that sets a colour tolerance for UV inkjet printing on finished objects. ISO 13655 defines how print colour is measured, and ISO/CIE 11664-6 defines the CIEDE2000 colour-difference formula, often written ΔE00 or Delta E 2000. ISO/TS 15311-2, which covers print quality for commercial digital printing on flat sheets, states that it does not set aims or tolerances, because they differ widely between applications. The figure you write is therefore a commercial agreement between buyer and supplier. Where your customer or brand owner already sets a colour tolerance for your current decoration, start from that, and confirm at the trial that the machine holds it on your item.
On a curved item, use an instrument with an aperture small enough to sit flat on the patch, and measure at the same marked position each time. Where that is not possible, measure patches printed in the same mode on a flatter piece of the same material and coating, record that they are a substitute, and still judge the item itself against the approved sample. Record the measured values of the approved sample when it is signed, because a physical sample can change with time. If the colour reference was made by another process, such as offset or screen printing, compare under more than one light source, because two prints can match under one light and differ under another.
For tactile and Braille signs, measure dot height and spacing rather than judging by touch, and check them against the code that applies to the project. Our Braille and tactile signage guide explains which rules apply in Dubai.
Step 5: Test each durability property separately
Durability is several properties, not one. A print can pass a cross-cut adhesion test and still rub off in transit, soften under perfume or fail in a dishwasher. Each exposure in your specification needs its own test, its own samples and its own pass criterion.
| Property | What it tells you | Example method to agree | What it does not tell you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adhesion | Whether cured ink stays bonded when the film is cut and tape is pulled away | A cross-cut and tape check based on ISO 2409:2020, or ASTM D3359-23 on metal. ISO 2409 excludes coatings thicker than 250 micrometres and textured coatings, so raised or tactile print needs a method agreed between the parties | Resistance to rubbing, chemicals, water or washing |
| Abrasion and rub | Whether print survives contact with other parts, packaging and handling | A rub or handling test on the actual item that copies the filling line and transport, with load, cloth and cycles recorded. ASTM D5264 is a rub-tester method for flat printed packaging such as labels and cartons, so as written it does not fit bottles or other three-dimensional items | Resistance to chemicals or to long-term wear in use |
| Chemical resistance | Whether perfume, alcohol, cleaning agents or the contents soften, stain or remove the print | Contact or immersion with the actual product for an agreed time and temperature, or a solvent double-rub check based on ASTM D5402-19(2024) with the solvent and number of rubs written down. ISO 2836:2021 sets methods for the resistance of prints to various agents; it is written for printed sheets, so using it on an object is an adaptation | Adhesion under mechanical stress, or behaviour in washing |
| Water and condensation | Whether soaking, ice or condensation weakens the print | A soak, chilled storage or condensation exposure that matches use, followed by a repeat adhesion check | Resistance to detergent and heat in a dishwasher |
| Dishwasher | Whether print survives the combined heat, detergent and spray of machine washing | Real wash cycles on the actual item with the number of cycles agreed. EN 12875-1:2005 is a reference method for domestic articles and sets no required number of cycles; test separately for commercial machines | Behaviour under any other exposure |
| Light and weathering | Whether colour fades or the print breaks down outdoors or in a shop window | Exposure for agreed hours under a named laboratory method, such as ISO 16474-2 (xenon arc) for coatings, compared with an unexposed sample | Outdoor life in years, because laboratory hours do not convert directly |
| Heat and temperature change | Whether hot filling, freezing, a burning candle or storage heat affects the print | A test at the real temperatures and durations of use | Chemical or abrasion resistance |
Three rules apply to every test. First, do not test straight off the machine, because adhesion and resistance keep developing after printing. PRO TECHnology's practice is to leave printed parts 24 hours before testing; if the ink's technical data sheet gives a longer time, use that. Waiting does not make up for too little UV light at the lamp, and if production fills, packs or stacks parts sooner, test at that interval as well. Second, record the cure-to-test time, the room conditions and the exact test conditions with the result. Third, use your own product and handling wherever the specification names them, not a generic substitute.
For the cross-cut, test the solid patch in the test file, printed with the same layers as the artwork, because the cut spacing depends on the total film thickness and primer, white and varnish all add to it. Record whether the test was on the item or on a flat panel, and where any failure occurred: at the substrate, at the primer or between ink layers. The result is a classification, not a measured bond strength.
Pre-treatment can improve adhesion, but it does not by itself give chemical resistance. Resistance to perfume or alcohol also depends on the ink chemistry, the cure, the film thickness, any protective varnish and the product formula, so run a rub test with your own fragrance rather than relying on alcohol alone.
If a print fails, find the cause before changing the machine or its settings. Common causes are too little cure; too much cure, which can make the film brittle; an ink or varnish that does not resist the test solvent even when cured; a layer too thick to cure through; an ink that does not suit the material; a contaminated, untreated or wrongly treated surface; a material supplier's coating that the ink does not bond to; and testing too soon. How a print fails is a clue. If it softens, smears or leaves colour on the cloth, look first at the cure and the ink. If it lifts away as a film or flakes at the edges, look first at the surface, the pre-treatment and the coating. Our guide to UV printing problems by material helps separate the causes.
Wording matters in the record. A workshop check based on ISO 2409 is useful evidence, but it is not a test to ISO 2409 unless the full procedure, equipment and conditions in the standard were followed. If your customers or regulators need formal results, commission an accredited laboratory and attach its report to the acceptance record.
Ink data sheets are not acceptance criteria. Marabu, for example, says the information in its UltraJet DUV-CP data sheet "should not be used for specification purposes". The test on your own item is what decides. Step-by-step procedures for the cross-cut, alcohol rub and soak tests are in our UV printing adhesion guide.
PRO TECHnology does not rate or promise UV print as dishwasher safe or microwave safe. Where washing matters, run real wash cycles on a sample of your own item, and record the outcome as a test result for that item, not as a rating.
Step 6: Prove repeatability across runs, restarts and batches
Repeatability means the machine gives the same accepted result across a long run, after a stop, on a new material batch and with a different operator. Test it by taking samples at fixed points and comparing each one with the approved sample.
- Within a run: keep the first, a middle and the last pieces of the timed run, from each fixture position or spindle, and check colour, white opacity, registration and defects on each. Print the machine's nozzle check pattern at the start and end of the run and keep it with the samples.
- After a stop: stop the machine as production would, for a break, a cleaning cycle or overnight, then restart with only the routine start-up procedure in the manual and check the first pieces again without further adjustment. Check white in particular, because white pigment settles when ink stands.
- Between material batches: print every batch and coating colour supplied, because a change in the material supplier's coating can change adhesion.
- Between operators and shifts: have a second person run the job from the written recipe (the settings, materials and fixture that passed), without help from the person who set it up.
Curing settings alone do not show how much UV light reaches the print. Lamp output falls with age and with ink mist on the lamp window, and less light reaches surfaces further from the lamp, such as the sides of a curved item or a recess. Where the machine allows it, measure UV intensity and dose at the print position with a radiometer suited to the lamp type, because an instrument made for mercury lamps can misread LED output. Record the readings at the trial and at site acceptance as the baseline for later checks; where a radiometer cannot be placed, agree another cure check, such as a solvent rub on a test patch.
Then freeze the recipe that passed: artwork version, colour profile, print mode, ink and primer, pre-treatment settings, curing settings and fixture. Keep a signed set of approved samples, labelled with the date, material batch and settings and stored away from light. Run a quick adhesion check on each new batch, and keep the tested piece with the job record, as our guide to UV printing on anodised aluminium describes.
Agree in advance which changes trigger a new test: a new material supplier, substrate, coating or finish, a new ink or primer, a new type of artwork, changed print or curing settings, a firmware or RIP (raster image processor) software update, a new colour profile, and major service work such as a print head or UV lamp replacement. After head work, check head alignment and colour before production restarts.
Step 7: Document what the machine needs to run
Acceptance should confirm what the machine needs to keep printing, not only what it prints. Most of these points come from documents the supplier can provide before purchase, so ask for them early and check them against your site.
| Requirement | What to obtain | What to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | The site requirements sheet for the exact model and document revision | Power supply and phases, compressed air pressure and quality, network connection and any uninterruptible power supply |
| Environment | Temperature and humidity ranges from the same document | Your production area holds those ranges all year, including in summer and when air conditioning fails |
| Ventilation | The safety data sheet for every ink, primer and cleaning fluid (section 8 sets the exposure controls), the manufacturer's extraction guidance, and the requirements of any mercury lamp, flame or plasma unit, which can add ozone, combustion gases or heat | Extraction or ventilation meets the documents and local rules, and is installed before commissioning |
| Safety | The safety data sheets, the machine's safety instructions and the list of guards and interlocks | Guards, interlocks, emergency stops and UV light shielding work at site acceptance, and operators have the gloves and eye protection the safety data sheets specify |
| Space and access | Footprint, clearances, weight and crate size | Floor loading, door widths and service access around the machine |
| Operator workload | The daily tasks and staffing the supplier assumes | Who loads, inspects and maintains, and how many machines one person can run |
| Maintenance | The maintenance schedule with daily, weekly and periodic tasks | Time per task, who does it, and whether production stops while it is done |
| Consumables | A list of inks, primers, flush, wipes, filters and wear parts with part numbers | Measured ink use per piece from the trial, local availability, shelf life and storage temperature |
| Waste | Section 13 of each safety data sheet, for waste ink, flush and wipes, plus rejected printed parts and empty containers | A disposal route that complies with local rules |
| Service and spares | Service terms, response arrangements, remote support and recommended spares | What is in writing, who attends, and what the warranty excludes |
| Training | Training scope, duration and who delivers it | Each operator can run the acceptance job and the daily maintenance unaided |
LSINC's site requirements for its PeriOne and Perivallo360m printers, summarised in our cylindrical UV printing guide, are a useful example of what a site sheet covers. They list power, compressed air, temperature and humidity ranges, clearances, venting of fumes to the outside and an internet connection for remote service. Figures can change between documents: LSINC's 2024 PeriOne brochure gives the supply as 230 VAC, while its 2026 documents give 200 to 240 VAC. Always work from the current document for your exact model.
Step 8: Sign the acceptance record and check the handover file
Before signing, repeat the key checks at site acceptance, even if the machine passed at the supplier's facility. Transport, local power, temperature, humidity and new operators can all change the result, the delivered unit may not be the machine the trial ran on, and the site run is the first one carried out entirely under your own conditions.
The acceptance record is the document both parties sign at the end. It lists the configuration, each criterion and method, the results and any open items, so that someone who was not present can see what was tested, on what, and with what result. If the purchase contract links a payment or the start of the warranty to acceptance, make sure the contract and the acceptance record use the same criteria.
What the acceptance record should contain
- Configuration: machine model and serial number, firmware and RIP software versions, ink series and batch numbers, primer and pre-treatment, print modes, print height above the item, curing settings with the lamp type, lamp hours and measured UV dose, fixtures and colour profiles.
- Trial conditions: date, location, operators, room temperature and humidity, item temperature, material batches and artwork versions.
- Criteria and results: each criterion as agreed, the method used, the number of samples, the measured or observed result, and pass or fail.
- Approved samples: signed samples held by both parties, with their measured values and storage conditions.
- Responsibilities: who supplied materials, who operated, who judged results, and how disputes and re-tests are handled.
- Open items: anything that failed or was not tested, with an agreed action and date.
What the handover file should contain
- Operator and maintenance manuals for the delivered configuration.
- Safety data sheets, in current revisions, for every ink, primer, flush and cleaning product.
- The maintenance schedule, the consumables list and recommended spare parts with part numbers.
- Warranty terms with the start date and exclusions, and the service contacts and response arrangements in writing.
- Software licences and backups of colour profiles, print modes and job recipes.
- Training records showing who was trained, on what, and the competence check each person passed.
- The signed site requirements, the acceptance record and the approved samples.
The production acceptance checklist
Use this checklist to plan the trial and record the results. The values in each criterion are agreed between buyer and supplier for your product, and the last column lists the evidence to record.
The file has three sheets. The checklist repeats these checks, with blank columns for your agreed value, the result, pass, fail or not tested, who checked and the date, then the handover documents and sign-off. The trial record lists the configuration to write down. The calculator holds the hypothetical two-fixture example; set fixtures to 1 and the swap time to 0 for the one-fixture case.
1. Application
| Item to verify | Method or evidence | Criterion to agree | What to record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substrate and coating | Material supplier specification and batch numbers | Application specification signed by buyer and supplier | Batch numbers tested |
| Geometry and print area | Drawing or sample with dimensions | Print area and tolerances defined | Drawing reference |
| Artwork and finish | Production files, test file and approved sample | Approved sample signed | File versions and sample ID |
| Handling and exposure | List of filling, packing, transport and use conditions | Each exposure linked to a test | Reference to the list |
2. Trial
| Item to verify | Method or evidence | Criterion to agree | What to record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Representative materials | Pieces from at least two batches where possible, at production temperature | Batches named in the test plan | Quantity per batch, item temperature |
| Delivered configuration | Ink set, primer, pre-treatment, print mode, curing and fixtures as quoted | Matches the quotation | Configuration list, pre-treatment interval |
| Fixtures | Production fixture used; every position checked for placement and height | Same placement and height in every position | Fixture ID and positions checked |
| Criteria agreed in advance | Test plan signed before printing | Plan signed before the run | Date signed |
3. Output
| Item to verify | Method or evidence | Criterion to agree | What to record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Print cycle time | Stopwatch timing of several cycles on the production artwork, every layer included | At or below the agreed time | Average of timed cycles |
| Machine cycle time | Timing from the start of one cycle to the start of the next, including loading | At or below the agreed time | Measured value, operator time per cycle |
| Non-printing time | Log of start-up, checks, cleaning, changeovers and stops | Within the agreed allowance | Minutes per activity |
| Accepted output per hour | Accepted pieces per shift, projected from the timed run and logged stops, divided by the shift hours | At or above the required figure | Pieces per hour and reject rate |
| Ink use per piece | A full fixture weighed before and after printing, and refills measured over the run | Within the cost model assumption | Millilitres or grams per piece |
4. Print quality
| Item to verify | Method or evidence | Criterion to agree | What to record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small text and fine lines | Test file inspected with a magnifier | Smallest required size legible | Smallest size that passed |
| Colour | Spectrophotometer, stated measurement condition and backing, CIEDE2000 | Maximum agreed difference from the approved sample | Difference per patch and instrument used |
| White opacity and registration | Comparison with the approved sample; offsets measured with a measuring magnifier or callipers | No more show-through than the sample; offsets within the agreed millimetres | Observations and offsets per position |
| Gloss, seam, texture, codes and defects | Inspection under controlled lighting; gloss meter, height gauge and scanner where needed | As agreed against the approved sample | Defects found, readings, scan results |
5. Durability
| Item to verify | Method or evidence | Criterion to agree | What to record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adhesion | Cross-cut and tape check based on ISO 2409 on the solid patch, after the agreed wait | Agreed classification, or no removal | Result, failure location, cure-to-test time |
| Abrasion and rub | Rub or handling test on the actual item | No visible wear after the agreed cycles | Cycles, load and observations |
| Chemical resistance | Contact, immersion or solvent rub with the named product | No softening, staining or transfer after the agreed exposure | Product, time, temperature and result |
| Water and condensation | Soak, chilled storage or condensation exposure as in use, then a repeat adhesion check | No softening or lifting after the agreed exposure | Conditions and result |
| Washing | Real wash cycles on the actual item | No visible change after the agreed number of cycles | Cycles, machine, detergent and result |
| Light and weathering | Agreed hours under a named laboratory method, compared with an unexposed sample | Colour change within the agreed limit | Method, hours and result |
| Heat and temperature change | Test at the real temperatures and durations of use | No visible change after the agreed exposure | Temperatures, durations and result |
6. Repeatability
| Item to verify | Method or evidence | Criterion to agree | What to record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Within the run | First, middle and last pieces from each position compared with the approved sample; nozzle checks kept | All within the criteria | Sample IDs and results |
| After a stop and restart | First pieces after a planned stop, routine start-up only | Within the criteria, white included | Result after restart |
| Between batches and operators | Each batch printed; second operator runs from the recipe | Within the criteria | Batch, operator and result |
| UV dose | Radiometer reading at the print position, or an agreed cure check | Within the agreed range of the trial baseline | Readings, instrument and lamp hours |
7. Operating requirements
| Item to verify | Method or evidence | Criterion to agree | What to record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site readiness | Site requirements sheet for the exact model, checked on site | Every item signed off before installation | Signed sheet reference |
| Ventilation and safety | Safety data sheets; extraction, guards, interlocks and UV shielding checked | Meets the documents and local rules | Who checked, and when |
| Maintenance and consumables | Schedule and parts list reviewed; daily maintenance timed | Matches the plan and the cost model | Minutes per day |
| Service and spares | Written service terms and spares list | Agreed in writing | Document references |
8. Acceptance and handover
| Item to verify | Method or evidence | Criterion to agree | What to record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site acceptance run | Key output, quality and durability checks repeated after installation, with a full-shift output run | Same criteria as the trial | Results and date |
| Training and competence | Each operator runs the acceptance job and daily maintenance unaided | Every named operator passes | Names and dates |
| Documents handed over | Handover file checked against the list in Step 8 | Complete | Missing items |
| Sign-off | Acceptance record signed by both parties, with open items listed | Signed | Date and signatories |
When direct UV printing is not the right process
A careful trial sometimes shows that direct UV printing is the wrong choice for a product. That is a useful result, not a failure of the trial. Another decoration process may suit better when:
- The item must survive repeated industrial washing, such as the hot washing of returnable bottles or the glasswashers used in hotels. Some screen-printing inks for glass are rated by their makers against named domestic and industrial dishwasher tests; the UV inkjet ink data sheets we have checked give no such cycle count. Whatever the process, check what a rating covers and wash-test it on the actual item.
- Volumes of one design are very high and stable. Screen printing, labels or sleeves can cost less per piece once their set-up is spread over a long run. Direct digital printing is strongest with many designs, short runs and frequent changes.
- A mirror metallic finish is required. Hot foil and metallisation are the usual routes to a reflective metal effect, so compare a printed sample of the metallic effect on your item with a foil or metallised sample before you decide.
- The print would sit where food or drink touches, or on plastic food packaging. PRO TECHnology's position is that the UV printed layer is not certified for direct food contact, so keep decoration away from drinking rims and food-contact surfaces. On plastic packaging, ink components can migrate through the wall, or transfer to the inside of other pieces when printed parts are stacked or nested. Ask the ink supplier for its food-contact documents and low-migration options before printing, and have the finished pack tested for migration where your market requires it.
- The surface is out of reach of the print heads or the curing lamp, such as deep recesses, tight internal corners or areas behind handles. Drops land less accurately as the distance from the heads grows, and a recess the lamp cannot reach may stay under-cured. Pad printing or a design change may be needed.
- The product faces long, harsh outdoor exposure without protection. Light and weathering tests may show that a different ink, a clear protective layer or another process is needed.
Who wrote this guide, and where trials run
This guide was written by the PRO TECHnology Digital Printing team. PRO TECHnology has worked in digital printing since 2011, and its Digital Printing division supplies industrial printing equipment in the UAE and the wider Middle East, including UV flatbed printers from Direct Color Systems, cylindrical UV printers from LSINC and wallPen vertical printers. PRO TECHnology engineers install the machines it supplies, alongside the manufacturer's engineers where the manufacturer attends, and support them locally with training, consumables and spare parts.
Print trials and demonstrations run at Sun Studio in Al Quoz, Dubai, the group's UV printing and demonstration studio and a sister company that has been printing since 2011. Trials use your own items and artwork on the models that run in production on Sun Studio's floor; other models are shown by arrangement. A trial returns the printed samples, a net speed figure timed on your item, an ink consumption figure and the adhesion results on your material. Other checks in this guide, such as a rub test with your own fragrance, are agreed in the test plan before printing.
Disclosure: PRO TECHnology sells and supports printing equipment and consumables, including the LSINC, Direct Color Systems and wallPen machines and the Marabu inks named in this guide. The guide is written to be useful whichever machine or supplier you choose, and it reports no test results of its own.
Frequently asked questions
What should a UV printer acceptance test include?
A UV printer acceptance test should include a timed run on your own materials and artwork, judged against criteria agreed in writing before printing. It checks print quality against an approved sample, tests each durability property your product needs separately, and repeats checks after a restart and on more than one material batch. It ends with confirmed site requirements and a signed record of the configuration that passed.
What is the difference between rated speed and accepted output on a UV printer?
Rated speed is the manufacturer's figure for a stated print mode or reference object, with no allowance for your loading, inspection, cleaning or rejects. Accepted output is the number of pieces that pass inspection per hour of a real shift, measured on your artwork with your fixturing and staffing. Only the accepted figure tells you what the machine will produce for you.
Is a cross-cut adhesion test enough to prove durability?
No. A cross-cut and tape check shows whether the ink stays bonded to the surface. It does not show resistance to rubbing, perfume, alcohol, cleaning agents, water, washing or sunlight. Each of those needs its own test on the actual item, with the method and pass level agreed in advance.
What is the difference between a factory acceptance test and a site acceptance test for a UV printer?
A factory acceptance test (FAT) checks the configured machine against the agreed criteria at the manufacturer's or supplier's facility, before it ships. A site acceptance test (SAT) repeats the key output, quality and durability checks after installation, with your power, environment and operators. A single machine often needs only a thorough print trial and a site acceptance test, but the criteria should be written down either way.
Who should supply the materials for a print trial?
The buyer should, from normal production stock and from more than one batch where possible. Hand-picked samples, or pieces sourced by the machine supplier, can hide variation in the substrate or its coating. A result on one material supplier's bottles or coating does not transfer automatically to another's.
كيف تختبر ماكينة طباعة UV قبل الشراء والاستلام
عينة العرض الجيدة تثبت أن الماكينة طبعت تصميماً واحداً على قطعة واحدة في ظروف مثالية، لكنها لا تثبت أداءها في الإنتاج الفعلي. قبل شراء طابعة UV أو استلامها، نفّذ تجربة طباعة على منتجاتك الفعلية باستخدام قطع من أكثر من دفعة إنتاج، واتفق كتابياً على معايير القبول قبل بدء الطباعة.
قِس عدد القطع المقبولة في الساعة بدلاً من السرعة التي تعلنها الشركة المصنّعة، واختبر كل خاصية من خصائص المتانة على حدة: الالتصاق، ومقاومة الاحتكاك، ومقاومة الكحول والعطور، ومقاومة الماء، وتحمّل الغسل في غسالة الصحون. لا تصنّف PRO TECHnology الطباعة بأنها آمنة في غسالة الصحون أو الميكروويف. وعندما يكون الغسل مهماً، تُختبر الطباعة بدورات غسيل فعلية على عينة من منتجك، وتُسجَّل النتيجة على أنها نتيجة اختبار لتلك القطعة لا تصنيفاً. ثم أعد الفحوصات الأساسية بعد التركيب في موقعك، ووقّع محضر الاستلام الذي يسجّل الإعدادات التي اجتازت الاختبار.
Sources
Standards are cited by designation, edition and shortened title as shown in the standards bodies' online catalogue listings, checked through search on 21 October 2026; EN 12875-1 is cited through the Swedish national listing of the same standard. We did not read the full texts, which the standards bodies sell, so this guide describes methods "based on" a standard rather than claiming conformance. LSINC details come from LSINC's PeriOne and Perivallo360m site requirements form (8 July 2026), its 2024 PeriOne, PeriQ360 and Perivallo360m brochures and its 2026 PeriOne brochure. The worked output example is hypothetical.
- ISO 2409:2020, Paints and varnishes: Cross-cut test
- ASTM D3359-23, Standard Test Methods for Rating Adhesion by Tape Test
- ASTM D5264-98(2019), Standard Practice for Abrasion Resistance of Printed Materials by the Sutherland Rub Tester
- ASTM D5402-19(2024), Standard Practice for Assessing the Solvent Resistance of Organic Coatings Using Solvent Rubs
- ISO 2836:2021, Graphic technology: Prints and printing inks, assessment of resistance of prints to various agents
- SS-EN 12875-1:2005 (Swedish adoption of EN 12875-1:2005), Mechanical dishwashing resistance of utensils, Part 1: Reference test method for domestic articles
- ISO 16474-2:2013 (with Amd 1:2022), Paints and varnishes: Methods of exposure to laboratory light sources, Part 2: Xenon-arc lamps
- ISO 3664:2025, Graphic technology and photography: Viewing conditions
- ISO 13655:2017, Graphic technology: Spectral measurement and colorimetric computation for graphic arts images
- ISO/CIE 11664-6:2022, Colorimetry, Part 6: CIEDE2000 colour-difference formula
- ISO/TS 15311-2:2018, Graphic technology: Print quality requirements for printed matter, Part 2: Commercial print applications utilizing digital printing technologies
- Marabu, UltraJet DUV-CP technical data sheet (version 1, 09/2024)
Plan a representative print trial
Send us your product, your artwork and the criteria it has to meet, and we can plan a trial at Sun Studio in Dubai with the timing, quality and durability checks agreed in advance.